Branding Recognition Pathways and Marketing Adaptation in Teen Social Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/y8zz1x95Keywords:
Adolescent consumers; social media engagement; brand recognition; loyalty formation.Abstract
This study, using Yuanqi Forest as a case study, examines the relationship between "likes" and brand awareness and early loyalty, and explores whether this path shifts with age groups. The study tracked three campaign cycles: the first, back-to-school KOL promotion; the second, the release of limited-edition winter flavors; and the third, a regular mix during the spring exam preparation period. The results indicate that "likes" do not equal loyalty. In teenagers' information flows, "likes" are often fleeting signals of peer visibility. They are only remembered when emotional spurts are combined with clear brand anchors and reinforced repeatedly over a short period of time. This pattern is largely consistent across different activities and platforms, so a more reliable interpretation is that "likes" don't automatically translate into loyalty. Age can alter the path from "like" to "true identification." In short, age matters—the path from emotional resonance to memory, and from memory to early loyalty, is shaped by the daily needs of different groups. Practical advice is to create content based on age: For younger groups, place the brand name within the image, use easy-to-read and easy-to-say labels, and include short reminders to "catch" likes. For older groups, anchor emotions around relevant interests, contextual prompts, and lightweight community tasks to encourage referrals. Subsequent research should validate these pathways through experiments and longer observation periods, test whether algorithm exposure is a common moderator, and examine whether these age effects extend beyond beverage categories.
Downloads
References
[1] Albert D, Chein J, Steinberg L. The teenage brain: Peer influences on adolescent decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2013, 22(2): 114–120.
[2] Bakshy E, Rosenn I, Marlow C, Adamic L. The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW ’12), 2012: 519–528.
[3] Belk R W. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, 15(2): 139–168.
[4] Berger J, Milkman K L. What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 2012, 49(2): 192–205.
[5] Binet L, Field P. The long and the short of it: Balancing short and long-term marketing strategies. IPA, 2013.
[6] Pentina I, Guilloux V, Micu A C. Exploring social media engagement behaviors in the context of luxury brands. Journal of Advertising, 2018, 47(1): 55–69.
[7] Moorman C. The CMO survey: Highlights and insights report — February 2022. Duke University, 2022.
[8] Somerville L H. The teenage brain: Sensitivity to social evaluation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2013, 22(2): 121–127.
[9] Boyd D. It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press, 2014.
[10] Cialdini R B. Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson, 2009.
[11] De Veirman M, Cauberghe V, Hudders L. Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 2017, 36(5): 798–828.
[12] de Vries L, Gensler S, Leeflang P S H. Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2012, 26(2): 83–91.
[13] Ephron E. Recency planning. Journal of Advertising Research, 1997, 37(4): 61–65.
[14] Escalas J E, Bettman J R. Self‐construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 2005, 32(3): 378–389.
[15] Grunert K G, Wills J M, Fernández-Celemín L. Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK. Appetite, 2010, 55(2): 177–189.
[16] Katz E, Lazarsfeld P F. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press, 1955.
[17] Keller K L. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 1993, 57(1): 1–22.
[18] Kietzmann J H, Hermkens K, McCarthy I P, Silvestre B S. Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 2011, 54(3): 241–251.
[19] Kristofferson K, White K, Peloza J. The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 2014, 40(6): 1149–1166.
[20] Lang A. The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 2000, 50(1): 46–70.
[21] McGaugh J L. Memory—a century of consolidation. Science, 2000, 287(5451): 248–251.
[22] Odgers C L, Jensen M R. Annual research review: Adolescent mental health in the digital age: Facts, fears, and future directions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2020, 61(3): 336–348.
[23] Orth U R, Malkewitz K. Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 2008, 72(3): 64–81.
[24] Petty R E, Cacioppo J T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag, 1986.
[25] Petty R E, Rucker D D, Bizer G Y, Cacioppo J T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 36: 123–205.
[26] Pieters R, Wedel M. Attention capture and transfer in advertising: Brand, pictorial, and text components. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68(2): 36–50.
[27] Roberto C A, Khandpur N. Improving the design of nutrition labels to promote healthier food choices and reasonable portion sizes. International Journal of Obesity, 2014, 38(S1): S25–S33.
[28] Sharp B. How brands grow: What marketers don’t know. Oxford University Press, 2010.
[29] Sherman L E, Greenfield P M, Hernandez L M, Dapretto M. The power of the like in adolescence: Effects of peer influence on neural and behavioral responses to social media. Psychological Science, 2016, 27(7): 1027–1035.
[30] Tulving E, Thomson D M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 1973, 80(5): 352–373.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







