On The Impact of Host Country Regulations on Multinational Corporations’ Fulfillment of Environmental Responsibilities

Authors

  • Mai Ju School of Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/cqk1zg21

Keywords:

host country regulations; multinational corporations; environmental responsibility; impact; coping strategies.

Abstract

In the context of economic globalization, the global operations of multinational corporations (MNCs) exert a profound impact on the environment. As a core standard governing corporate environmental conduct, host country regulations play a dual role in shaping MNCs’ fulfillment of environmental responsibilities. This paper first analyzes the composition of host country regulations, which collectively form the institutional framework constraining the environmental behavior of MNCs. The study finds that such regulations can promote MNCs’ environmental responsibility performance by clarifying responsibility boundaries, providing oversight mechanisms, and driving technological innovation. At the same time, they may impose constraints due to shortcomings in regulatory design, weak enforcement, and excessively high compliance costs. Based on these findings, the paper proposes strategies for MNCs, including establishing robust environmental management systems, actively providing feedback on regulatory implementation issues, and drawing on international compliance experience. Through this analysis, the paper aims to offer theoretical references for host countries to improve their environmental regulatory systems and enhance MNCs’ performance in fulfilling environmental responsibilities, thereby promoting the coordinated development of cross-border business operations and ecological protection, and contributing to the achievement of global sustainable development goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pan, F., Xi, B., & Wang, L. (2014). Evolutionary game analysis of environmental regulation strategies among local governments. China Population Resources and Environment, 24(6), 97–102.

[2] Aguilera-Caracuel, J., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013). Green innovation and financial performance: An institutional approach. Organization & Environment, 26(4), 365–385.

[3] Luo, X., & Liu, W. (2019). Political connection and corporate environmental violation punishment: Shelter or supervision—evidence from PE database. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 41(10), 85–99.

[4] Murty, M. N., & Kumar, S. (2003). Win-win opportunities and environmental regulation: Testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Management, 67(2), 139–144.

[5] Li, X. (2020). Research on the influence of environmental regulations on China's foreign direct investment—based on the perspective of home country. University of International Business and Economics.

[6] Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.

[7] Kong, D., Wei, Y., & Ji, M. (2021). Study on the influence of environmental protection fee to tax on enterprise green information disclosure. Securities Market Herald, 8(1), 2–14.

[8] Lin, K. J., Tan, J., Zhao, L., & Karim, K. (2015). In the name of charity: Political connections and strategic corporate social responsibility in a transition economy. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 327–346.

[9] Gan, S., Yang, W., & Wang, H. (2019). Property right nature, political connection and tax stickiness. Modern Finance and Economics (Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics), 39(2), 43–56.

[10] Bi, Q., Peng, J., & Zuo, Y. (2012). Environmental information disclosure system, corporate governance and environmental information disclosure. Accounting Research, 7(1), 39–47.

Downloads

Published

09-12-2025

How to Cite

Ju, M. (2025). On The Impact of Host Country Regulations on Multinational Corporations’ Fulfillment of Environmental Responsibilities. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.54097/cqk1zg21