Framing the Belt and Road Initiative: A Comparative Analysis of News Coverage in Western and Chinese Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/wx1gch77Keywords:
Belt and Road Initiative, framing theory, discourse analysis, media comparison, China-West relations.Abstract
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), launched by China in 2013, represents one of the most ambitious international cooperation frameworks of the 21st century. While Chinese media emphasize its significance as a platform for “win-win cooperation” and “shared prosperity,” Western media frequently frame it as a tool of geopolitical influence and economic risk. This study employs framing theory to conduct a comparative analysis of 200 news reports from 2013 to 2024, published by Chinese state-affiliated media (People’s Daily, Xinhua News Agency) and major Western outlets (The New York Times, BBC, Financial Times). Through quantitative content analysis and critical discourse analysis, the research identifies key framing patterns, linguistic features, and ideological underpinnings in both corpora. The findings reveal significant framing divergence: Chinese media highlight themes of cooperation, connectivity, and mutual development, whereas Western media stress debt dependency, geopolitical competition, and environmental concerns. The study concludes that framing differences stem from distinct political values, media systems, and strategic interests, underscoring the role of media in shaping global perceptions of China’s rise.
Downloads
References
[1] Sheng J, Jun H, Kakar A. Exploring the Significance of Intercultural Communication for the Success of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)[J]. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 2023, 6(2).
[2] Ohashi H. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the context of China’s opening-up policy[J]. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 2018, 7(2): 85-103.
[3] Khan M S. MEDIA FRAMING AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF SOCIAL ISSUES: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF HOW MEDIA COVERAGE SHAPES PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARDS KEY SOCIAL TOPICS[J]. Social Thought and Policy Review, 2024, 2(2): 50-59.
[4] Zhang C, Meadows III C W. International coverage, foreign policy, and national image: Exploring the complexities of media coverage, public opinion, and presidential agenda[J]. International Journal of Communication, 2012, 6: 20.
[5] Richardson P B. Geopolitical encounters and entanglements along the belt and road initiative[J]. Geography Compass, 2021, 15(8): e12583.
[6] de LT Oliveira G, Murton G, Rippa A, et al. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Views from the ground[J]. Political Geography, 2020, 82: 102225.
[7] Peters M A. The Chinese Dream, Belt and Road Initiative and the future of education: A philosophical postscript[J]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2022, 54(7): 857-862.
[8] Summers T. Negotiating the boundaries of China’s Belt and Road Initiative[J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2020, 38(5): 809-813.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







