Layered Safeguards: A Middle Path for Gig Workers' Rights Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/7rz6b809Keywords:
Gig Economy; subordination; Incomplete Labor Relationship; rights configuration.Abstract
This paper focuses on the rapid development of China's gig economy, centering on the issue of labor rights protection. The analysis indicates that the traditional "dichotomy" for determining labor relations struggles to accommodate the hybrid characteristics of gig employment, leading to inconsistent rulings in judicial practice and the hollowing out of workers' rights. Although the concept of an "incomplete labor relationship" has been proposed, its application remains hindered by conceptual ambiguity, lack of clear identification criteria, and platforms' use of algorithms to evade responsibilities. Employing methodologies such as literature analysis, case studies, and comparative research, this article proposes a reconstruction of the criteria for identifying labor relations: by establishing a "Third Category of Labor" beyond the traditional employee and civil subject frameworks, while deconstructing "Subordination" into a multi-dimensional and quantifiable evaluation system. The core innovation lies in constructing a rights configuration path characterized by a "modular deconstruction with scenario-based combination," achieving an institutional balance between flexible employment and labor protection through layered safeguards.
Downloads
References
[1] Mingming Li, Xinyun Hu, Keyan Jin, Jiachen Han. Exploring factors influencing entry into the gig economy: A study of Chinese workers. Acta Psychologica, 2025, 259: 105301.
[2] Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. Recommendations of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China for Formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development. Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, China, 2025.
[3] Jiao Hao, Cui Yu, Luo Qiao. Occupational Attributes and Platform-based Flexible Employment Matching in the Context of Gig Economy: An Empirical Analysis Based on Machine Learning. Economic Perspectives, 2025, 66(05): 125-143.
[4] N.Srnicek, Platform Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017, p.47.
[5] Zhang Lanxia, Li Jiamin, Mao Mengyu. Impact of Perceived Algorithmic Control of Gig Workers on Work Engagement: A Dual-Pathway Model Based on Cognitive and Affective Factors. Journal of Business Economics, 2024, 44(3): 47-58.
[6] Mary L. Gray and Siddharth Suri. Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Translated by Zuo Anpu. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2020, 2.
[7] PKU Law (Peking University Law Information) , "Case of Guo v. A Food Delivery Platform (Confirmation of Labor Relationship)" , PKU Law Database, Document No. CLI.C.114460133 ,https://www.pkulaw.com/pfnl/a6bdb3332ec0adc47ae3f54596f3cda64a5ac0be50c48e04bdfb.html?keyword=%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0,accessed 15 Oct 2025.
[8] Relevant People’s Court, "Case of Sheng [Surname] v. a Platform Management Company (Dispute over Confirmation of Labor Relationship) – Labor Relationship Confirmed Despite the Worker’s Registration as an Individual Industrial and Commercial Household (Due to Existing Labor Subordination)", PKU Law Database, PKU Law Citation Code: CLI.C.405729216, https: // www.pkulaw.com/pfnl/95b2ca8d4055fce1e16715b57c005fa3fb1a8151df4b49e6bdfb.html?keyword=%E5%8A%B3%E5%8A%A8%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0,accessed15 Oct 2025.
[9] Relevant People’s Court, "Case of a Information Technology Co., Ltd. v. Zhou [Surname] (Labor Contract Dispute) – First-instance Court Affirmed Labor Relationship from the Perspective of Organizational Integration and Economic Benefits; Second-instance Court Denied Labor Relationship from the Perspective of Employment Autonomy", PKU Law Database, PKU Law Citation Code: CLI.C.408525732, https://www.pkulaw.com/pfnl/95b2ca8d4055fce17962efb53ffde08bedc2b6077e0dbf42bdfb.html, accessed 15 Oct 2025.
[10] Xu Hongzhi, Wang Tianfu. The Gig Labor: Exploring the Change of Labor Form and Its Formation Mechanism in the Digital Era. Economist, 2022, 37(12): 25-34.
[11] PARENT-ROCHELEAU X, PARKER S K. Algorithms as work designers:how algorithmic management influences the design ofjobs . Human Resource Management Review,2022. DOI:10. 1016 / j. hrmr. 2021. 100838.
[12] LEHDONVIRTA V. Flexibility in the gig economy:managing time on three online piecework platforms. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2018, 33(1): 13-29.
[13] Tian Silu. Algorithmic Power of Employers and Its Legal Regulation in the Context of Technological Subordination. Chinese Journal of Law, 2022, 44(06): 132-150.
[14] Ministry of Labor and Social Security. Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning the Establishment of Labor Relations (Laoshebu Fa [2005] No. 12), issued May 25, 2005.
[15] SYROVATKA F. Precarious associational power: Reflections on the power resources of employers'associations illustrated by the example of the German metal and electrical industry. Global Labour Journal, 2024(1):24.
[16] Tu Yongqian. Research on Labor Rights and Interests of Gig Workers: Comments on extraterritorial practice and Its References to China. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2021, 37(02):64-76.
[17] Lou Yu. The Historical Evolution and Realistic Reflection on the Subordination Theory of Labor Relations ——Concurrent Discussion on "Incomplete Labor Relations". Political Science and Law, 2024, 43 (08): 2-19.
[18] See Yao Pengbin. Technical Subordination: Reconstruction of the Identification Benchmark of Workers in the Algorithmic Era, Lanzhou Academic Journal, 2022,43(2):101; Tian Silu. Algorithmic Power of Employers and Its Legal Regulation in the Context of Technological Subordinatio. Chinese Journal of Law, 2022, 4(06): 134.
[19] Fang Changchun. The Third Type of Labor and Its Rights and Interests: Problems and Challenges. Frontiers, 2022, 11(08):52-62.
[20] Lou Yu. Criteria for Determining Legal Relationships Involving New Forms of Employment. China Legal Science, 2024, 41 (05):285-304.
[21] Jinjiang District People’s Court of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, "One of the 'Top 10 Typical Cases of New Employment Form Labor Disputes in Chengdu City (2025)': Case of Zhou [Surname] v. a Technology Company (Work-Related Injury Compensation) – 'Three-Step Mediation Method' Applied to Secure Timely Work-Related Injury Compensation for Core Delivery Riders", 2 April 2025, Jinjiang District People’s Court Official Website, http: // cdjjfy. scssfw.gov. cn/article/detail/2025/04/id/8775083. shtml,accessed 6 October 2025.
[22] Pei Jialiang, Liu Shanshi, Zhang Zhipeng, Xie Yu. Good algorithms, bad algorithms: Research on the gig workers overwork under algorithmic logic. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2024, 38(1): 101-115.
[23] WOOD A J, GRAHAM M, LEHDONVIRTA V, et al.Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 2019, 33(1): 56-75.
[24] Reinhard Richardi, Münchener Handbuch zum Arbeitsrecht, 3. Aufl., 2009, §16 Rn. 40.
[25] See European Centre of Expertise (ECE) in the field of labour law, employment and labour market policies, Thematic Review2021 on Platform Work Synthesis Report, at https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8419&furtherPubs=yes (Last visited on October 24, 2022).
[26] See[2017]11 WLUK 238.
[27] See Chang Kai. Employment or Cooperation: What Kind of Employment Relationship Does the Sharing Economy Rely On. Human Resources, 2016, 31(11):38-39.
[28] Chang Kai. The Nature, Characteristics and Legal Regulations of the Employment Relationship of Platform Enterprises. China Law Review, 2021, 8(04): 31-42.
[29] Zhang Gong. Regulation of "Incomplete Labor Relations" in New Forms of Employment. China Social Security, 2021, 28(12): 59.
[30] See Wang Tianyu. Interpretation Path and Regulation System of “Employee-like Persons” in Internet Platform Employmen. Global Law Review, 2020, 42(03): 85-100; Lu Haina, Chen Yiheng. The Protection of the “Third Kind of Workers” in Gig Economy from the Perspective of Social Rights. Human Rights, 2020, 19(01): 105-120.
[31] Wang Tianyu. The "Trichotomy of Labor" Governance Model for Platform Employment. China Legal Science, 2023, 40(02): 256-284.
[32] Ministry of Labor and Social Security of the People's Republic of China, Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning the Establishment of Labor Relations (Laoshebu Fa [2005] No. 12), issued May 25, 2005, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People's Republic of China Official Website, https://www.mohrss.gov.cn/xxgk2020/fdzdgknr/zcfg/gfxwj/ldgx/201407/t20140717_136260.html,accessed 6 October 2025.
[33] Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China, Opinions on Providing Judicial Services and Safeguards for Stable Employment (Fafa [2022] No. 36), issued 26 December 2022, China Court Official Gazette Website,http: //gongbao.court.gov.cn/Details/fa36899743b9d0e967e07339791ac5.html,accessed 6 October 2025.
[34] Lou Yu. Criteria for Determining Legal Relationships Involving New Forms of Employment. China Legal Science, 2024, 41 (05):285-304.
[35] Knecht. Mit Sozialpolitik regieren. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich, 2024, p.126f.
[36] See Simon Deakin, Gillian S. Morris. Labour Law (Sixth Edition),Hart Publishing,2012,p.174-176.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
