Mechanisms By Which Implicit Advertising on Short Video Platforms Erodes Consumer Trust
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/gzja7x72Keywords:
Short video platform; implicit advertising; erosion of consumer trust; Algorithmic transparency.Abstract
With the rapid development of short video platforms, a new form of consumer guidance known as "grass planting" has gradually become an important means for young users to obtain product information and make purchasing decisions. The deepening of the commercialization of new social media platforms has led to the gradual penetration of implicit software and broad, blurring the boundary between bloggers and consumers. This study constructs a three-stage model of "trustlessness" (trust input-dilution-disintegration) to explore the mechanism of implicit advertising eroding trust through content disguise, algorithm reinforcement, and emotional discourse. The study combines literature review, case analysis and user psychology theory, using a mixed qualitative and quantitative method to analyze user recognition ability and trust changes. The results show that users are easily misled by content disguised as "real sharing", and the exposure effect of the platform algorithm deepens the illusion of trust, but once the interest relationship is exposed, the collapse of trust spreads rapidly. The conclusion is that the erosion of trust in implicit advertising is a structural result of the interaction between content design, platform mechanism and user psychology. Governance recommendations include improving algorithm transparency, clarifying advertising labels, and strengthening media literacy, providing theoretical and practical references for platform governance, advertising ethics, and consumer education.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Q. Research on the impact of short video platform recommendation algorithms on user trust. Journalism and Communication Studies, 2024, 31(5): 112-124.
[2] Cui D. Emotional rhetoric in live-streaming marketing. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China), 2020, 42(8): 142-150.
[3] Han Y. A study on native advertising operations on Xiaohongshu. Modern Marketing (Late Edition), 2024, (03): 63-65.
[4] Huang A, Zainol Z. The impact of short video platform characteristics on marketing effectiveness: A bibliographic review and future research directions. International Journal of Business and Management, 2025, 20(2): 45-60.
[5] Mohamed N A, Setyawan A, Rahmawati N. The impact of short-form video marketing, influencer relatability, and trust signals on Gen Z’s purchase intention. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 2025, 6(1): 291-304.
[6] Mathur A, Narayanan A, Chetty M. Endorsements on social media: An empirical study of affiliate marketing disclosures on YouTube and Pinterest. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 2(CSCW): 1-26.
[7] Gui F, Boerman S, Willemsen L M. Across platforms and languages: Dutch influencers and legal disclosures. Social Media + Society, 2024, 10(3): 1-15.
[8] Avram M, Micallef N, Patil S, Menczer F. Exposure to social engagement metrics increases vulnerability to misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2020, 1(1): 1-10.
[9] Hinnosaar M, Hinnosaar T, Kummer M. Influencer cartels. Working Paper, 2024.
[10] Wikipedia contributors. Media bias. Wikipedia, 2025-02-10.
[11] Yan Q. Where is the “antidote” to short video addiction? People’s Daily Theory Edition, 2025-02-17.
[12] Luo J, Zheng G, Wang L. The impact mechanism of personalized social media advertising on consumer psychological response and ad avoidance intention. Tsinghua Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2021, 36(5): 143-155.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







